Legal Opinion

McKinley Infuser, Inc. v. Zdeb

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided June 7, 2001No. CIV.A. No. 99-S-1178PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*649ORDER

BOLAND, United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before me on the plaintiffs’ Amended Verified Motion for Protective Order (the “Amended Motion for Protective Order”), filed May 24, 2001.1 The Amended Motion for Protective Order requests that I enter an order either prohibiting the defendants from questioning Brian Zdeb or imposing as conditions to such questioning the following restrictions:

1. That no transcript of Mr. Zdeb’s deposition by plaintiffs counsel be issued until after the defendants question him;

2. That Mr. Zdeb’s counsel be prohibited from “coaching” Mr. Zdeb “in any…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Kendrick v. Penske Transportation Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  3. Franks v. NimmoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  4. Hall v. Clifton PrecisionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. In re Stratosphere Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corp. v. CuraScript Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2007
  2. COYOTE SPRINGS INV., LLC VS. DIST. CT. (BRIGHTSOURCE ENERGY, INC.)Nevada Supreme Court · 2015
  3. COYOTE SPRINGS INV., LLC VS. DIST. CT. (BRIGHTSOURCE ENERGY, INC.)Nevada Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Chesbrough v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2014
  5. Pape v. The Suffolk County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to AnimalsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API