Legal Opinion

State Bank v. Hayes

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Hughes county; Hon. Loring , E. Gappy, Judge. Action bj the State Bank of Fillmore against John Hayes. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCorson, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon a directed verdict. The action is by the indorsee of a promissory note against the maker. The defendant, in his answer, admitted that he executed the note in controversy to one F. H. Smith for the sum of $800, and alleged that the said note was for the accommodation of the said Smith, and was without consideration, except a small portion thereof, and that in regard to that portion the defendant had an offset against said Smith prior to the sale or pretended sale of the said note to the plaintiff. The defendant avers that, prior to any sale or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Farber v. National Forge & Iron Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Backus v. SpauldingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  3. Wood v. BrushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Davis v. NollWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Robinson v. LymanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1833

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jerke v. Delmont State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  2. First National Bank v. LangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  3. Tattersfield v. Independent School DistrictSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Waverly Independent Consolidated School District No. 1 v. YoungSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Smith v. FunstonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API