Legal Opinion

United States v. Walter Esposito

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 11, 1992No. 91-5815PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.

Walter Esposito appeals his conviction of narcotics offenses under 21 USC § 841(a)(1). The sole issue on appeal is: Because the government listed certain substantive drug offenses as predicate acts in Esposito’s earlier RICO trial in which a jury acquitted him, does the second indictment for offenses based on the same drug transactions that supported the RICO predicate acts constitute a vindictive prosecution which deprives Esposito of his due process rights under the Fifth Amend ment? The district court held that it did not. We will affirm.

I

In 1985,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. United States v. Richard P. Console, United States of America v. Morton Markoff, D.O., United States of America v. Edward C. CurcioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. James E. MacEwanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Alberto ParamoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  4. Commonwealth v. SpeightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. United States v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API