Legal Opinion
Doe v. United Air Lines, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 20, 2008No. B192865PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MANELLA, J.—
In the underlying action, Jane Doe (Doe), a minor, asserted claims against United Air Lines, Inc. (United), arising out of a sexual assault. After granting summary judgment in favor of United, the trial court granted Doe’s motion for a new trial on her claims against United. United appealed from the new trial order, and Doe asserted a protective cross-appeal regarding the grant of summary judgment. We reverse the order granting a new trial and affirm the grant of summary judgment.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On December 16, 2004, John Doe, acting as Doe’s guardian ad…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Langadinos v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Eastern Airlines, Inc. v. FloydSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Santa Clara County Local Transportation Authority v. GuardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hall v. Goodwill Industries of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Estill v. Cnty. of Shasta, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Full Throttle Films, Inc. v. National Mobile Television, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Colantuono v. Lake CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Estill v. County of ShastaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.