Legal Opinion
Hays v. Postmaster General of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 17, 1989No. 87-2824PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
Arthur Hays petitioned the district court for review of a decision by the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) upholding his removal from his job with the Postal Service. The district court held that it lacked jurisdiction. We review the district court’s determination de novo. Lofton v. Heckler, 781 F.2d 1390, 1392 (9th Cir.1986).
FACTS
Hays received a notice of proposed removal from his job on January 28, 1985. On February 3, he appealed this decision to the MSPB, but did not make any discrimination claims; on February 24, he filed a formal Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) complaint,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Thomas W. Hill v. U.S. Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Otto H. Lizut v. Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Jimmy Dale Lofton, in Pro Se v. Margaret M. Heckler, as Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- In RE McCAULEYCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chaney v. RubinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- McAdams v. RenoDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
- Edward G. Spranger v. Anthony A. Frank, Postmaster General, United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- 49 Fair empl.prac.cas. 251, 49 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 38,721 Arthur Hays v. Postmaster General of the United States United States Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989