Legal Opinion
49 Fair empl.prac.cas. 251, 49 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 38,721 Arthur Hays v. Postmaster General of the United States United States Merit Systems Protection Board
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 17, 1989No. 87-2824Published
1Opinion of the Court
868 F.2d 328
49 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 251,
49 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 38,721
Arthur HAYS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
POSTMASTER GENERAL OF the UNITED STATES; United States
Merit Systems Protection Board, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 87-2824.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Dec. 12, 1988.
Decided Feb. 17, 1989.
Elaine W. Wallace, Oakland, Cal., for petitioner-appellant.
James A. Friedman, Atty., Office of Labor Law, U.S. Postal Service, Washington, D.C., for respondents-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.
Before HUG and…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Thomas W. Hill v. U.S. Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Otto H. Lizut v. Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Jimmy Dale Lofton, in Pro Se v. Margaret M. Heckler, as Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- In RE McCAULEYCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.