Edward G. Spranger v. Anthony A. Frank, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
15 F.3d 1089
5 NDLR P 89
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Edward G. SPRANGER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Anthony A. FRANK, Postmaster General, United States Postal
Service, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 92-15812.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 8, 1993.*
Decided Nov. 24, 1993.
1
Before THOMPSON and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges; NIELSEN,** District Judge.
2
MEMORAND…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Salvatore Joseph Marino v. Dan Vasquez, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States of America, and Lummi Indian Tribe, Intervenor-Appellant v. State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Harold J. Romain v. Admiral Harold Shear, Administrator of the Department of Transportation, Maritime AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Lois Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Hutchinson J. Kroeger v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pamela D. Tucker v. Department of Veterans AffairsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025