Legal Opinion

Latrobe Water Co. v. Public Service Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 7, 1936No. Appeal, 20PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

For many years the appellant has been supplying water in the borough of Latrobe and portions of the contiguous township of Derry, Westmoreland County. The mining town of Bradenville is located in that township a few miles east of Latrobe. Some of the residents of Bradenville have been supplied with water by appellant for more than forty years.

In August, 1931, three petitions for an extension of appellant’s facilities to other portions of the village were filed with the commission. After various hearings and engineering conferences, the commission filed its report and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Latrobe Water Co. v. P. S. C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cage v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Commonwealth v. Ziegler Dairy Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Pennsylvania Telephone Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Blair v. Motor Carriers Service Bureau, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1939
  5. Liebtag v. Dilworth, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API