Legal Opinion

Liebtag v. Dilworth

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided May 11, 1961No. 2889Published

1Opinion of the Court

.Ullman, J.,

We have before us for consideration plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment under Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1098 in this action in mandamus and defendants’ preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer to plaintiffs’ complaint in mandamus. Plaintiff, in his complaint, contends that he has been unlawfully and improperly denied the right to appear before the zoning board of adjustment on behalf of a party who seeks a variance; that the zoning board of adjustment has promulgated an invalid regulation which prohibits nonlawyers from practicing before the board and has…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Gardner v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  4. Shortz v. FarrellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. London v. KingsleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API