Kneeland v. Hull
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Grand Traverse; Corbett, J. Bill by Fred A. Kneeland and John H. Cole against Francis H. Hull and George E. Sprang to quiet title. Defendants filed an answer in the nature of a cross-bill. From a decree for defendants,' complainants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
Complainants filed a bill in the circuit court of Grand Traverse county, in chancery, to quiet title to lots 71, 72, 73, 74, and 75 of block 3 of Oak Park addition to the village of Traverse City, relying upon a deéd made by the auditor general on a sale made on decree entered in December, 1895, for the taxes of 1893. Defendants filed an answer in the nature of a cross-bill, asking to have the deed to complainants declared a cloud on defendants’ title, and set aside. The objections taken to the proceeding were two: First, that the deed to complainants covered ■ the whole of the lands, whereas…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Board of Com'rs of Pitkin County v. TimrothSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Bruno v. MadisonUtah Supreme Court · 1911
- Telonis v. StaleyUtah Supreme Court · 1940
- Perkins v. MasekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Harding v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.