Bruno v. Madison
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Seventh District; Hon. A. H. Christensen, Judge. Action by Dominic Bruno against Neil Madson and another. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtFeign, C. J.
Appellant, as the alleged owner, brought this action against the respondents pursuant to Comp. Laws 1907, section 3511, to determine their adverse claim, and to quiet the title to certain real estate described in the complaint as lot 13, block 10, in the town of Schofield, Carbon County, Utah. The respondents answered the complaint, and after denying appellant’s alleged ownership averred that they were the owners and entitled to the possession of said property. They further averred that the real estate in question had been duly and regularly assessed for taxation for the year 1901; that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Muirhead v. SandsMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Pentecost Administrators v. StilesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
- Clark v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
- Otoe County v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
- Kneeland v. HullMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wall v. KaighnUtah Supreme Court · 1914
- Hiltscher v. JonesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1917
- Telonis v. StaleyUtah Supreme Court · 1940
- Clooten v. WangNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- Pace v. WightNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.