Legal Opinion

Harding v. Auditor General

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1905No. Calendar No. 21,067PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Mandamus by Vine Harding and others to compel James B. Bradley, auditor general, to refund the purchase money on void tax sales.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, C. J.

The relators are the sole legatees of Josiah E. Harding, who in his lifetime purchased from the State certain lands for the taxes of 1891, 1892, 1894, and 1895. Later ejectment was brought to recover possession of the lands. A judgment in the ejectment case was rendered in favor of the defendant therein. Application was then made to the auditor general to have the amount paid for these lands refunded. He denied the application. A writ of mandamus is asked to compel him to grant it-

*647The relators claim that, as the deeds were declared invalid in the ejectment suit, they are entitled to have…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kneeland v. HullMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Newton v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Mortgage Corp. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API