Legal Opinion

Crane v. Hathaway

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 22, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Buchanan, Y. C.

Complainants sue to restrain an alleged violation by defendant of a community scheme restrictive covenant, the two parties being adjoining lot owners. The covenant is “that only one dwelling-house and a private garage shall occupy this property” (i. e., each lot).

There was originally on defendant’s lot a one-and-a-half or two-story frame house or bungalow of five rooms—kitchen, dining-room, living-room and two bedrooms. To this she has joined two two-room “shacks” so as to make the whole consolidated physical structure under one continuous roof, the result being the addition of…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bear v. BernsteinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  2. Bruno v. HannaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  3. Koett v. TateCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  4. Kytle v. PeckSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  5. Berger v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API