Legal Opinion

Schuhknecht v. State Plumbing Board

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1936No. Calendar 39,006PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

Petitioner seeks, by mandamus, to require the State plumbing board to issue to Mm a renewal of Ms license as a master plumber.

In 1933 and 1934 petitioner was a duly licensed master plumber. Licenses are annual and expire on the last day of the year but may be renewed as later set forth. Petitioner did not ask for renewal of Ms license for the year 1935, because of ill health and financial distress but, in 1936, he desired to resume Ms vocation and, on April 16th, through his attorney, tendered the board an application fee of $25 and asked for a renewal license. The request was refused on the…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hoste v. Shanty Creek Management, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Tyler v. Livonia Public SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Fass v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  4. City of Warren v. DannisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Murphy v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API