Legal Opinion
City of Warren v. Dannis
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided August 20, 1984No. Docket 73218PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtR. B. Martin, J.
The particular facts in this case are important in deciding the issues involved. Warren is a home-rule city and for a number of years its treasurers, without any objection from the city council, determined what investments should be made with temporarily surplus city funds. Finally one treasurer made some extremely questionable and completely inappropriate investments which ended in the city’s losing large sums of money. Fortunately for the city, these losses were repaid by the brokerage house that handled the improper financial transactions. The state and bonding authorities were aghast and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Magreta v. Ambassador Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
- Moore v. CarneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- Board of Education of the Union School District v. GoodrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Murphy v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Messmore v. KrachtMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- GIANNETTI BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION CO. v. City of PontiacMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Marrocco v. RandlettMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
- Marina Bay Condominiums, Inc v. SchlegelMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- Wayne-Oakland Bank v. Brown Valley Farms, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- Janda v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.