Legal Opinion

Crumpler v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 17, 1932No. 22689PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Broyles, O. J.

1. An essential element in the offense of seduction is that the person seduced was an unmarried, as well as a virtuous, female. Penal Code (1910), § 378. It follows that upon a prosecution for that offense, the burden is on the State to affirmatively show that the female charged to have been seduced was an unmarried woman at the time of the alleged offense. See, in this connection, Bennett v. State, 103 Ga. 66 (29 S. E. 919, 68 Am. St. R. 77); Neil v. State, 117 Ga. 14 (43 S. E. 435); Zackery v. State, 6 Ga. App. 104 (64 S. E. 281); People v. Krusick, 93 Cal. 74 (28 Pac. 794);…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bennett v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. People v. KrusickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Neil v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. State v. CarrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  5. Zackery v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wagnon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API