Legal Opinion

Bennett v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 26, 1897PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Indictment for fornication. Before Judge Fite. Gordon superior court. August term, 1897.

1Opinion of the CourtFish, J.

Pete Bennett was indicted, at the August term, 1897, of the superior court of Gordon county, for fornication with Martha Reynolds. The indictment charged that he was a single man and she a single woman at the time the offense is alleged to have been committed. Martha Reynolds, the only witness sworn, testified, in behalf of the State, that she *67was delivered of a bastard child a few months prior to the trial, and that Pete Bennett was its father; that he had sexual intercourse with her, in Gordon county, in May, 1896. There was no evidence that either of them was unmarried. The accused was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hopper v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
  2. Kendrick v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sutton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. State v. WakefieldOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Martínez v. El Registrador de la Propiedad de San GermánSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1944
  4. Neil v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. State v. CavettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API