Legal Opinion

Columbia River Packers Assn., Inc. v. Hinton

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 2, 1942No. 142PublishedCited by 142 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black

The petitioner filed a bill for an injunction charging that the respondents attempted to monopolize the fish industry in Oregon, Washington, and Alaska, in violation of the Sherman Act. 26 Stat. 209. The Norris-La Guardia Act declares that no federal court shall, except under certain specified circumstances, have jurisdiction to issue an injunction in any case which involves or grows out of a “labor dispute.” 1 The jurisdictional requirements were not present here. But the District Court held that, since this case did not involve or grow out of a “labor dispute,” these requirements were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Milk Wagon Drivers' Union, Local No. 753 v. Lake Valley Farm Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. New Negro Alliance v. Sanitary Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Hinton v. Columbia River Packers Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
  4. Columbia River Packers Ass'n, Inc. v. HintonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1939

3Cited by142 opinions

  1. Allen Bradley Co. v. Local Union No. 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. United States v. National Ass'n of Real Estate BoardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Jacksonville Bulk Terminals, Inc. v. International Longshoremen's Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. Women's Sportswear Manufacturers Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. American Medical Assn. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

137 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API