Columbia River Packers Assn., Inc. v. Hinton
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black
The petitioner filed a bill for an injunction charging that the respondents attempted to monopolize the fish industry in Oregon, Washington, and Alaska, in violation of the Sherman Act. 26 Stat. 209. The Norris-La Guardia Act declares that no federal court shall, except under certain specified circumstances, have jurisdiction to issue an injunction in any case which involves or grows out of a “labor dispute.” 1 The jurisdictional requirements were not present here. But the District Court held that, since this case did not involve or grow out of a “labor dispute,” these requirements were…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Milk Wagon Drivers' Union, Local No. 753 v. Lake Valley Farm Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- New Negro Alliance v. Sanitary Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hinton v. Columbia River Packers Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- Columbia River Packers Ass'n, Inc. v. HintonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1939
3Cited by142 opinions
- Allen Bradley Co. v. Local Union No. 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. National Ass'n of Real Estate BoardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Jacksonville Bulk Terminals, Inc. v. International Longshoremen's Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Women's Sportswear Manufacturers Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- American Medical Assn. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
137 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.