Legal Opinion

City of Alexandria v. CLECO CORP.

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided August 3, 2010No. Civil Action 1:05-cv-01121PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGMENT

DEE D. DRELL, District Judge.

For the reasons detailed in a separate ruling issued on this date, the Intervenor Defendants’ Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Intervenor’s Tortious Interference with Contract Claims (Doc. 158) will be GRANTED. Accordingly, the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation on Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 383) will be ADOPTED IN PART. However, the Court does NOT ADOPT the portion of the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation on Motion to Dismiss referring to “policy considerations.” (Doc. 383, p. 7).

RULING

A number of matters are currently pending before the…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Plotkin v. IP Axess Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  4. Herrmann Holdings Ltd. v. Lucent Technologies Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  5. Richard J. Dodson v. Spiliada Maritime Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Breaux v. Assumption Parish School BoardDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API