Legal Opinion

Espander v. City of Albuquerque

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided March 4, 1993No. 13007PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTZ, Judge.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs, William R. and Marcia K. Es-pander (the Espanders), appeal from a summary judgment granted by the district court in favor of Defendant, City of Albuquerque (City). The Espanders filed a complaint alleging property damage and personal injury caused by flooding onto their property and into their residence by water that came from a City arroyo. The City moved for summary judgment on the ground that it was immune from liability under the New Mexico Tort Claims Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 41-4-1 to -29 (Repl.Pamp.1989). The City predicated its motion on the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. General Dynamics Corporation, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. General Dynamics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  2. Bober v. New Mexico State FairNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Ledbetter v. WebbNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Castillo Ex Rel. Castillo v. County of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  5. City of Albuquerque v. ReddingNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Evelyn Difelici, f/n/a Evelyn Barnes v. City of LanderWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Bybee v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Bell v. New Mexico Interstate Stream CommissionNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Allocca ex rel. Allocca v. New Mexico Department of Energy Minerals & Natural ResourcesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Bell v. New Mexico Interstate Stream CommissionNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API