Bell v. New Mexico Interstate Stream Commission
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FLORES, Judge.
The opinion filed December 3,1993 is withdrawn and the following substituted therefor.
Plaintiffs appeal the summary judgment dismissing their claims. The basis for the judgment was the district court’s determination that sovereign immunity had not been waived. Plaintiffs raise the following issues on appeal: (1) sovereign immunity is waived pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 41-4-6 (Repl.Pamp.1989), and that alternatively, (2) there was no sovereign immunity prior to enactment of the Tort Claims Act for proprietary functions of a governmental entity such as the maintenance of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Roth v. ThompsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Klineline v. BlackhurstNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- Castillo Ex Rel. Castillo v. County of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- City of Albuquerque v. SanchezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
- North v. Public Service Co. of New MexicoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Garner v. Department of CorrectionsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
- Bell v. New Mexico Interstate Stream CommissionNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
- Allocca ex rel. Allocca v. New Mexico Department of Energy Minerals & Natural ResourcesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994