Seligman v. Carr
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order denying a motion to vacate the judgment and conclusions of law, and to render a different judgment under sections 663 and 663% of the Code of Civil Procedure. H. Z. Austin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
Action to quiet title. Plaintiffs had the judgment. Defendant Carr disclaimed all interest in the cause. Defendant Webb appeals from the judgment and from the order denying his motion made under sections 663 and 663% of the Code of Civil Procedure. The appeal is upon the judgment-roll, which by stipulation includes the findings of the court and its conclusions of law as well as the judgment. The facts necessary to the decision sufficiently appear in the findings without setting forth the averments, of the pleadings.
It appears from the findings that on January 24, 1881, Samuel, William and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Adams v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Sears v. AckermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Stockwell v. CouillardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
- City of Santa Rosa v. Fountain Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Derby v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1854
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kraemer v. KraemerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Alamo School District v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Carlsbad Mutual Water Co. v. San Luis Rey Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
- Hartwig v. Central-Gaither Union School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Boring v. FilbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957