Legal Opinion

Northeast Oklahoma Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. State ex rel. Corporation Commission

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 19, 1991No. 74453PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Chief Justice.

The dispositive issue is whether the mootness doctrine bars review of the Corporation Commission’s order which approves the terms of a proposed contract intended by the applicant (PSO) for entry with a state agency, when the actual bidding procedure later ended with the rejection of the Commission-approved contract and the acceptance of a third party’s bid and where the appellant had previously been declared legally ineligible to compete for the contract’s award. We answer in the affirmative.

The Board of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services (Board) solicited bids…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. Cleveland County Home Loan AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  2. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. Payne, County Treas. v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  4. In re Mental Health of D. B. W.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  5. Peppers Refining Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Norma Faye Pyles Lynch Family Purpose LLC v. Putnam CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. TorresSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  3. Nichols v. NicholsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  4. Northeast Okl. Elec. v. Corp. Com'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  5. Simington v. ParkerCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API