Legal Opinion

United States v. Oregon State Bar

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided November 25, 1974No. 74-362PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

MORELL E. SHARP, * District Judge.

The United States brings this civil action to enjoin the Oregon State Bar from further publication, distribution or suggestion of a schedule of attorneys’ fees. The complaint is filed and jurisdiction obtained under Section 4 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 4, alleging violation of Section 1 of the Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. The Government alleges that defendant and various of its members and officers are engaged in an illegal conspiracy to fix prices. Only the Oregon State Bar is made a defendant to this suit.

The defendant moves for summary…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Atlantic Cleaners & Dyers, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Silver v. New York Stock ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States Dental Institute v. American Association of OrthodontistsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975
  2. United States v. National Society of Professional EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1974
  3. Dattilo v. Tucson General HospitalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  4. Boddicker v. Arizona State Dental AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  5. People v. Roth, New York County Courts1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API