Legal Opinion
United States v. Mirama Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided February 12, 2002No. 00CV2269-K(LAB)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT
KEEP, District Judge.
On November 30, 2001, Plaintiff filed the instant motion for summary judgement; Defendant opposes. Both sides are proceeding through counsel. Oral argument, limited to the issue of whether the government need furnish expert testimony to support its motion, was heard on January 22, 2002.
I. Background
This is not your usual summary judgement motion: aside from evidentiary objections, the relevant material facts are clear and uncontested. Plaintiffs complaint seeks civil damages for Defendant’s failure to notify…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Michael H. Weitzenhoff Thomas W. MarianiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Spectrum Brands, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2016
- United States v. Mirama Enterprises, Inc., a California Corporation Dba Aroma House-Wares Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Control Solutions, LLC v. ElecsysAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- Hutton v. NyhartDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2019
- In Re Pacific Fertility Center LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.