Legal Opinion

United States v. Mirama Enterprises, Inc., a California Corporation Dba Aroma House-Wares Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 28, 2004No. 02-56466PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge:

We consider the appropriate range of penalties for violating the reporting requirements of the Consumer Product Safety Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 2064(b), 2068(a)(4), 2069(a)(1).

Facts

Mirama Enterprises, d/b/a Aroma Housewares Co. (“Aroma”), is a California corporation that distributes electric kitchen appliances. Aroma distributed between 30,000 and 40,000 juice extractors in the United States. The juicers employed a rapidly spinning metal grater, whose sharp teeth pulverized fruits and vegetables that were inserted through a plastic chute.

Aroma began receiving consumer reports…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Kenaitze Indian Tribe v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. Mirama Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2002

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Eliu Cinto-Velasquez v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  2. United States v. Spectrum Brands, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2016
  3. Pequignot v. SOLO CUP COM.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
  4. United States v. Zen Magnets, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API