Legal Opinion

Smythe v. Hanson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 26, 1895PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Greene Circuii' Court.—Hon. James T. Neville, Judge. Plaintiff should have stated that he was a physician, duly, authorized by the state board of health to practice as such. His contract was in violation of a positive statute forbidding the carrying on of the business under which the obligation was attempted to be made, and was, therefore, void. R. S., secs.. 6871 and 6881; 3 Am. and Eng.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Greene Circuii' Court.—Hon. James T. Neville, Judge. Plaintiff should have stated that he was a physician, duly, authorized by the state board of health to practice as such. His contract was in violation of a positive statute forbidding the carrying on of the business under which the obligation was attempted to be made, and was, therefore, void. R. S., secs.. 6871 and 6881; 3 Am. and Eng. Encyclopedia of Law, page 872; Doivning v. Ringer, 7 Mo. 292; Friend v. Porter, 50 Mo. App. 89; Lawson on Contracts, sec. 281; Broom’s Legal Maxims [8Ed.], page 731; Bishop on Contracts, sec.…

1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, P. J.

—This suit is for medical services, and was instituted before a justice of the peace. The circuit court, on appeal, tried the cause without the intervention of a jury, and rendered judgment for plaintiff. In doing so the court made a special finding, which is conceded to be supported by the evidence, and which is as follows:

“That the plaintiff has been a_ practicing physician in other states than Missouri for about eleven years; *287that he practiced medicine in the state of Missouri for two years only prior to the time of performing the services mentioned in plaintiff’s account; that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Prince v. Eighth Street Baptist ChurchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Davidson v. BohlmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Reichardt v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
  2. Tooker v. DuckworthMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Bassen v. MoncktonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  4. Rothwell v. GibsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  5. O'Bannon v. WydickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API