Legal Opinion

Gitto v. Societá Anonima Di Navigazione

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided April 25, 1939PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge,

This is a motion by the defendant under Rule 35 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, to have the infant plaintiff submit to, the taking of X-ray pictures by a physician named by the defendant. The plaintiff objects to defendant’s -choice -of physician and requests that the Court appoint an imr partial physician. The issue is thus presented . whether a defendant seeking a physical examination under Rule 35 has the privilege of naming his own physician.

Rule 35(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure provides: “Order for Examination. In an…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Looney v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1992
  2. Powell v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1993
  3. The ItaliaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1939
  4. Martin v. Superior Court in and for Co. of MaricopaArizona Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API