Linville v. Earlywine
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Rush Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtDewey, J.
Earlywine, an infant, declared by his next friend against Linville, in slander. The declaration contains the usual 'colloquium, but no averment of extraneous facts. The words laid are:—“The sorrel horse is mine and Offutt’s, and Earlywine stole him.”—•“ Earlywine could be sent to the penitentiary for stealing.”—“ Earlywine could be sent to the penitentiary for stealing the sorrel horse.”—“ If he don’t get that horse, I will send him to the penitentiary.”—“tie stole a horse.”-—•“ He could be sent to the penitentiary for stealing 'the sorrel horse.”—“He stole the sorrel horse.” Plea, the…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wheeler v. RobbIndiana Supreme Court · 1824
- Stout v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1820
3Cited by14 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Hays v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1844
- Hollingsworth v. State ex rel. HarveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
- Rodebaugh v. HollingsworthIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
- Hart v. CoyIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.