Wheeler v. Robb
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Gibson Circuit Court. — This was an action of slander by Robb agáinst Wheeler. Pleas, 1st, the general issue; 2dly, a special plea of justification. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff below.
1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.
After the testimony was closed, the following instruction to the jury was asked of the Court, on the part of the defendant: “that the words laid in the declaration musíbe proved, and that equivalent expressions will not suffice;” which instruction the Court refused to give. In Maitland v. Goldney, 2 East, 426, Mr. Justice Lawrence, in speaking of the action of slander, observes, “I take the rule in actions of this *331sort to be, that though the plaintiff need not prove all the-words laid, yet he must prove so much of them as is sufficient to-sustain his cause of action, and it is not enough for…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Jackson v. StetsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1818
- Olmsted v. MillerNew York Supreme Court · 1828
3Cited by15 opinions
- Weston v. LumleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
- Linville v. EarlywineIndiana Supreme Court · 1838
- Smelser v. Wayne & Union Straight Line Turnpike Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Tucker v. CallIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Ray v. MooreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.