Legal Opinion

Fanelle v. LoJack Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 12, 2000No. CIV. A. 99-4292PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

LOWELL A. REED, Jr., Senior District Judge.

Defendant Lojack Corporation has filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Upon consideration of defendant’s motion (Document No. 2), plaintiffs’ response (Document No. 6), and the evidence submitted therewith, the motion will be granted in part and denied in part.

I. BACKGROUND

On Friday, July 18, 1997, a blue Lexus automobile was reported stolen in West Philadelphia. Unbeknownst to the thieves, the car was equipped with a tracking device…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Sinn v. BurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Hoy v. AngeloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. John H. Cox v. Keystone Carbon Company, Richard Reuscher and William ReuscherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mzamane v. WinfreyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. AFL PHILADELPHIA LLC v. KrauseDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Mallory v. S & S PublishersDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Mallory v. S & S PublishersDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Ciolli v. IravaniDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API