McClintock v. Roger's Cablesystems of Minneapolis Ltd. Partnership
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge.
Appellant Kathleen McClintock sought to hold respondents, Rogers Cable and Atrex, civilly liable for her injuries sustained in a criminal attack by Jeffrey Charette. The trial court granted summary judgment for respondents holding that the respondents did not owe appellant any affirmative duty to protect her from the attack in that the specific circumstances of the attack were not reasonably foreseeable. McClintock appeals. We affirm the trial court’s decision on slightly different grounds.
FACTS
Appellant, Kathleen McClintock, had a cable television hookup installed at…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ponticas v. K.M.S. InvestmentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Larson v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Erickson v. Curtis Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Dellwo v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Delgado v. LohmarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.