Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Curtis Investment Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 27, 1989No. C7-88-1177PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SIMONETT, Justice.

Does the operator of a commercial parking ramp owe a duty to a ramp customer to protect her from a trespassing rapist? We think so and affirm the court of appeals. As to the legal responsibility of the security firm hired to patrol the ramp, we hold, as did the court of appeals, that there are issues of fact on whether the security firm breached its duty and on causation.

Plaintiff-respondent Garnet Erickson was sexually assaulted and raped in the Curtis parking ramp in downtown Minneapolis late one winter afternoon as she was preparing to drive her car out of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. Housing Auth. of City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  2. Williams v. Cunningham Drug Stores, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Sylvester v. Northwestern Hospital of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. Pietila v. CongdonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Roettger v. United Hospitals of St. Paul, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Timberwalk Apartments, Partners, Inc. v. CainTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. McClung v. Delta Square Ltd. PartnershipTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Clohesy v. Food Circus Supermarkets, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  4. King Ex Rel. King v. Northeast Security, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2003
  5. L.A.C. Ex Rel. D.C. v. Ward Parkway Shopping Center Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2002

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API