Legal Opinion

In Re Pursuant to § 39-1-30 of Ordinance Adopted by City of Providence

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided February 11, 2000No. 99-405-M.PPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LEDERBERG, Justice.

This case reflects the frustration of residents, travelers, and municipalities suffering the effects of rutted streets and sidewalks caused by delayed or faulty res torations following excavations. 1 The City of Providence (city or Providence) has sought our review of the Public Utilities Commission’s nullification of a city ordinance regulating these excavations. In support of its petition for certiorari, Providence argued that the Public Utilities Commission (PUC or commission) lacked jurisdiction to review the ordinance, and in its review, applied an incorrect…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brennan v. KirbySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
  2. Matter of Falstaff Brewing Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
  3. Town of East Greenwich v. O'NEILSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
  4. State v. FloresSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
  5. City of East Providence v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. DearmasSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  2. DelSanto v. Hyundai Motor Finance Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
  3. Narragansett Electric Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API