Legal Opinion

State v. Dearmas

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided February 13, 2004No. 2002-189-M.PPublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FLANDERS, Justice.

We review here a Superior Court order granting the state’s motion to seize a blood sample from the petitioner, Jose Dearmas, as well as a search warrant issued by that same court to the same effect. The petitioner is a defendant in a pending criminal case charging him with two counts of first-degree child molestation. The state requested and obtained the blood-seizure order and search warrant because it sought to conduct tests on the petitioner’s blood to ascertain whether the petitioner’s DNA matched the DNA obtained from body-fluid evidence that the perpetrator left…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Dred Scott v. SandfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
  3. Accent Store Design, Inc. v. Marathon House, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  4. People v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. State v. DiStefanoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. OliveiraSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
  2. Labor Ready Northeast, Inc. v. McConaghySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  3. Arnold v. LebelSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
  4. Kells v. Town of LincolnSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
  5. Chambers v. OrmistonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API