State v. Dearmas
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FLANDERS, Justice.
We review here a Superior Court order granting the state’s motion to seize a blood sample from the petitioner, Jose Dearmas, as well as a search warrant issued by that same court to the same effect. The petitioner is a defendant in a pending criminal case charging him with two counts of first-degree child molestation. The state requested and obtained the blood-seizure order and search warrant because it sought to conduct tests on the petitioner’s blood to ascertain whether the petitioner’s DNA matched the DNA obtained from body-fluid evidence that the perpetrator left…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Dred Scott v. SandfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
- Accent Store Design, Inc. v. Marathon House, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
- People v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- State v. DiStefanoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State v. OliveiraSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
- Labor Ready Northeast, Inc. v. McConaghySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
- Arnold v. LebelSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
- Kells v. Town of LincolnSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
- Chambers v. OrmistonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.