Legal Opinion

Nygaard v. United Parcel Service General Services Co.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided April 3, 1998No. Civil 96-824-FRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRYE, District Judge.

The plaintiffs, package car drivers employed by United Parcel Service, allege that they have suffered repetitive stress injuries from using hand-held computers known as delivery information acquisition devices (DIADs) in the performance of their jobs. Before the court is the motion of defendant Inforite Corp. for summary judgment (# 54); the motion of defendant Toppan Moore Co., Ltd. for summary judgment (# 53); the motion of defendants United Parcel Service General Services Co. and II Morrow, Inc. for summary judgment (# 55); and the motion of defendant Toppan…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Sensenbrenner v. Rust, Orling & Neale, Architects, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  5. Clark v. Bear Stearns & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Scott v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2005
  2. Terry Cash-Darling v. Recycling Equipment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
  3. Mcanally v. BerryhillDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API