Rijal v. United States Citizenship & Immigration Services
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
RICHARD A. JONES, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Dkt. ## 17, 18. No party requested oral argument. As the court’s review is limited to the administrative record, the court finds oral argument unnecessary. For the reasons stated below, the court GRANTS Defendant’s motion, DENIES Plaintiffs motion, DISMISSES this action, and directs the clerk to enter judgment for Defendant.
II. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Anil Rijal is a citizen of Nepal. He entered the United States on a visitor visa in May 2005. While lawfully…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Taye Addisu Mokhtar Al-Saeed Ghassan Abu Hemdeh v. Fred Meyer, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Intel Corporation v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Mary Anne Bendixen v. Standard Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Visinscaia v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Rijal v. United States Citizenship & Immigration ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Anil Rijal v. UscisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Aravamuthan v. US Citizenship & Immigration ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2025
- Berardo v. United States Citizenship and Immigration ServicesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.