Legal Opinion

Gray v. Gray

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 16, 1996No. 83612PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WATT, Justice:

Two issues are presented in this divorce proceeding: (1) Whether property acquired during coverture and purchased with one party’s veterans’ disability benefits is the separate property of the veteran or may be considered as jointly-acquired property subject to division under 43 O.S.1991 § 121, and (2) whether an order awarding temporary support can be modified retroactively. We hold that although disability benefits are the separate property of the veteran, property purchased with those funds during coverture may properly be considered jointly-acquired and divisible upon…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Porter v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  3. Thielenhaus v. ThielenhausSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. Carrier v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Teel v. TeelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Larman v. LarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  2. Colclasure v. ColclasureSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  3. CHILDERS v. CHILDERSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  4. Standefer v. StandeferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  5. Bischoff v. BischoffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API