Legal Opinion
Faiyaz v. Dicus
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided July 12, 2000No. A00A0621PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Phipps, Judge.
The underlying appeal involves a challenge to the trial court’s denial of a motion to vacate an arbitration award. Because the arbitrator validly exercised his authority in rendering the award and no basis for vacating the award has been demonstrated, the trial court’s order is affirmed.
On March 11, 1996, Mohammad Faiyaz and Medina Enterprises, Inc. (collectively “Faiyaz”) entered into a purchase and sale agreement with Frank Dicus and Dicus Enterprises, Inc. (collectively “Dicus”) for Faiyaz to buy the Elegant Touch Dry Cleaners for $380,000. Faiyaz paid $100,000 and became…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Greene v. HundleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- Ralston v. City of DahlonegaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Haddon v. Shaheen & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Kesler v. VealSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- Gilbert v. MontlickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Demorest v. City of BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Marchelletta v. Seay Construction Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Mateen v. DicusCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Cypress Communications, Inc. v. ZachariasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Aguilera v. Palm Harbor Homes, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.