Legal Opinion

City of Demorest v. City of Baldwin

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 11, 2001No. A01A1251PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge.

The City of Demorest appeals from the trial court’s order denying Demorest’s claim to enjoin the enforcement of a contract as modified between itself and the City of Baldwin and granting attorney fees to Baldwin. On appeal Demorest challenges the validity of the entire contract between Demorest and Baldwin, the award of attorney fees, and other findings of the trial court. We discern no error and affirm.

Demorest and Baldwin entered a contract to construct a water treatment plant that would provide water to both cities. After three modifications to the contract, Demorest sued…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Greene v. HundleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  2. Annis v. Tomberlin & Shelnutt Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  3. Faiyaz v. DicusCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  4. Dunn v. LightleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Green v. SommersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  2. Flowers v. Union Carbide Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  3. Newman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. Meeks v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API