Legal Opinion

Kopet v. Klein

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 27, 1967No. 40200PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nelson, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court denying a motion of defendant, George Klein, doing business as Miracle Water Products, for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

Defendant was the distributor of certain water-softening devices and equipment manufactured by Water Refining Company, Inc. The latter, however, was not served with a summons and complaint.

On March 19, 1964, defendant sold a water softener to plaintiff which was designed to regenerate automatically at preset intervals. The purchase price of the unit was $279 including installation.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Beck v. SpindlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  2. Bekkevold v. PottsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Despatch Oven Co. v. RauenhorstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  4. Hoye v. Century Builders, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Iron Fireman Coal Stoker Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Moosbrugger v. McGraw-Edison CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. Lesueur Creamery, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Haskon, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Hercules, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  3. Valley Farmers' Elevator v. Lindsay Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. O'LAUGHLIN v. Minnesota Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Wenner v. Gulf Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API