Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Johnson

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 28, 2011No. 10-P-735PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarhart, J.

The defendant appeals from the denial of his revised motion for a new trial.1 At trial, and for a sixteen-month *506period before trial, the defendant represented himself. On appeal, the defendant argues that he was deprived of his constitutional2 right to the assistance of counsel during the pretrial proceedings because no waiver of counsel colloquy was conducted until the second day of trial, some sixteen months after his motion to dismiss counsel was allowed. See G. L. c. 211D, § 5; S.J.C. Rule 3:10(3), as amended, 416 Mass. 1309 (1993). See also Commonwealth v. Mullen, 72 Mass. App. Ct. 136,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Westbrook v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Commonwealth v. RandolphMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  5. Commonwealth v. DagracaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CampbellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. Neary-FrenchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  3. Adoption of GabeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
  4. Commonwealth v. HaltiwangerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2021
  5. Commonwealth v. HempelMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2026

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API