Westbrook v. Arizona
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. Although petitioner received a hearing on the issue of his competence to stand trial, there appears to have been no hearing or inquiry into the issue of his competence to waive his constitutional right to the assistance of counsel and proceed, as he did, to conduct his own defense. “The constitutional right of an accused to be represented by counsel invokes, of itself, the protection of a trial court, in which the accused — whose life or liberty is at stake — is without counsel. This…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
3Cited by209 opinions
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Charles William Proffitt v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Offender RehabilitationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- State v. LaffertyUtah Supreme Court · 1988
204 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.