Legal Opinion

McMenamin v. Evesham Municipal Util. Authority

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 7, 1969PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

104 N.J. Super. 161 (1969)

249 A.2d 21

FRANCIS B. McMENAMIN AND ROSE M. McMENAMIN, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS,

v.

EVESHAM MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AUTHORITY, A PUBLIC BODY CORPORATE AND POLITIC UNDER N.J.S.A. 14B-4, 5 AND 6, IN THE TOWNSHIP OF EVESHAM, BURLINGTON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided January 7, 1969.

Mr. Joseph S. Georgiana for plaintiffs (Messrs. Capehart & Scatchard, attorneys).

Mr. James M. Davis, Jr. for defendant (Messrs. Powell and Davis, attorneys).

WICK, J.S.C.

This matter involves cross-motions for summary judgment in order to determine…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Febbi v. Bd. of Review, Div. of Employment SEC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. Sims v. Alabama Water Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. Millville Improvement Co. v. Millville Water Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1921
  4. Howe v. City of OrangeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1906
  5. McDowell v. Avon-by-the-Sea Land & Improvement Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Browning-Ferris Industries of North Jersey, Inc. v. City of PassaicSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  2. Oliver v. HyleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  3. State ex rel. Imperial Utility Corp. v. BorgmannMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Browning-Ferris Industries of North Jersey, Inc. v. City of PassaicSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  5. McMenamin v. EVESHAM MUN. UTIL. AUTHORITYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API