Legal Opinion

Howe v. City of Orange

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided January 18, 1906PublishedCited by 6 opinions

On demurrer to bill.

1Opinion of the Court

Gabbisoy, Y. C.

This is a bill filed by Annie H. B. Howe, charging that she is the owner of a house-in the city of Orange;- that the city of Orange owns and maintains a system of public water-supply for the benefit of the inhabitants, and that on Saturday, May 6th, 1905, the complainant was notified by the clerk of the water department of the city of Orange that water would not be supplied to the premises until a bill of $201.39 for water previously supplied thereto had been paid; that subsequently the water was turned on, but she was again notified that the supply would be discontinued and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Westlake & Button v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
  2. City of Atlanta v. BurtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  3. St. Louis Brewing Ass'n v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  4. Panton v. Duluth Gas & Water Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  5. State ex rel. Murray v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dodd v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Linne v. BredesWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. State ex rel. Latshaw v. Board of Water & Light CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  4. Waldron v. International Water Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1921
  5. Nourse v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API