Millville Improvement Co. v. Millville Water Co.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On bill for injunction. On hearing at return of order to show cause.
1Opinion of the Court
Leaming, V. C.
Complainant corporation is the owner of eight several residence buildings in the city of Millville; the individual complainants are the several tenants who occupy the buildings. The corporation, as landlord, and the individuals, as tenants, join in the bill filed-herein to restrain defendant water company from carrying out its purpose to refuse to supply water to the several tenants unless complainant corporation, as owner of the buildings, pays or guarantees the payment of the usual charges for water to be supplied to the buildings for the use of the several tenants.
There is no…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- City of Chicago v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
- Turner v. Revere Water Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
- American Water-Works Co. v. State ex rel. WalkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Robbins v. Bangor Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1905
- Jopling v. Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Western Reserve Steel Co. v. Village of Cuyahoga HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- Etheredge v. City of NorfolkSupreme Court of Virginia · 1927
- Nord v. Butte Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
- Potter v. HillNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- McMenamin v. Evesham Municipal Util. AuthorityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.