Legal Opinion

Causemaker v. DeRoo

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 10, 1941No. 35,139PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoch, J.:

This was an action to set aside a conveyance alleged to have been made in fraud of the plaintiff as a creditor of the grantors, A demurrer to the petition by the grantors and the grantee was overruled, and from that order the grantee appeals. The principal question is whether recovery was barred by the statute of limitations or by laches of the plaintiff.

On February 28,1925, Arthur H. DeRoo and Mina L. DeRoo, his wife, executed their promissory note to Arthur Causemaker, the appellee, for $5,000, due one year from date. All parties were…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Black v. BlackSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  2. Donaldson v. JacobitzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  3. Hutto v. KnowltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  4. Lowell-Woodward Hardware Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  5. Parmenter v. LomaxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Transamerica Insurance v. TroutCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  2. Cole v. ThackerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  3. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. ParishCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  4. Manka v. Martin Metal Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  5. Stratton v. Wood Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API