Legal Opinion
Hill v. City of S.F.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided September 14, 2017No. A148544PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSiggins, J.
*264The City and County of San Francisco (the City) approved construction of a three-unit condominium project proposed by real parties in interest Jeremy Ricks, Tracy Kirkham and Joe Cooper on Telegraph Hill at 115 Telegraph Boulevard. Appellant Protect Telegraph Hill argues that the approval was unlawful because an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the project should have been prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).1 We conclude no review was necessary under CEQA because the project was categorically exempt from review and no unusual circumstances exist to override…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho CordovaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- County of Inyo v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Hines v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- San Francisco Tomorrow v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
3Cited by8 opinions
- Covina Residents for Responsible Dev. v. City of Covina, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Covina Residents for Responsible Development v. City of CovinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- Protect Tustin Ranch v. City of TustinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- Sunflower Alliance v. Cal. Dept. of ConservationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
- Sunflower Alliance v. Cal. Dept. of ConservationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.