Legal Opinion

Herbage v. McEntee

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1879PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Saginaw. Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

The plaintiff sued the defendant before a justice of the peace and declared on a promissory note of which the following is a copy:

“Bast Saginaw, April 22d, 1872.

$200.00. Bor value received I promise to pay Daniel Herbage or bearer the sum of two hundred dollars with ten per cent, interest the 22d day of April, 1873.

W. B. SCHENDALL.”

Endorsed: “ Patrick McEntee.”

The justice rendered judgment for the plaintiff, but the circuit court reversed it on certiorari. It seems to have been supposed that in Rothschild v. Grix, 31 Mich., 150, the former was held to be a maker of the note there in question…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wetherwax v. PaineMichigan Supreme Court · 1853
  2. Rothschild v. GrixMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Borden v. Fletcher's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Peninsular Savings Bank v. HosieMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Allison v. KinneMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Sidorski v. LeppakMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API