Legal Opinion

Allison v. Kinne

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1895PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Mandamus. Eelator applied for mandamus to compel respondent to ■quasb the service upon him of a declaration. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

On October 31, 1894, Comstock F. Hill commenced suit in the Washtenaw circuit court by filing ■declaration and entering rule to plead. The action was in .assumpsit against John D. Allison, Jacob Bentler, and William H. Allison, jointly, on a promissory note made March 30, 1892, by John D. Allison and Jacob Bentler to James D. Allison or bearer, for $320, and payable at •the residence of O. F. Hill, in Lodi. It was indorsed by the name of W. H. Allison, and a payment of $100 was also indorsed thereon. Defendants John D. Allison and Jacob Bentler reside in Washtenaw county, while the defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Denison v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Herbage v. McEnteeMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Clark v. LichtenbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grenawalt v. NyhuisMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Engel v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API