Allison v. Kinne
Michigan Supreme Court
Mandamus. Eelator applied for mandamus to compel respondent to ■quasb the service upon him of a declaration. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
On October 31, 1894, Comstock F. Hill commenced suit in the Washtenaw circuit court by filing ■declaration and entering rule to plead. The action was in .assumpsit against John D. Allison, Jacob Bentler, and William H. Allison, jointly, on a promissory note made March 30, 1892, by John D. Allison and Jacob Bentler to James D. Allison or bearer, for $320, and payable at •the residence of O. F. Hill, in Lodi. It was indorsed by the name of W. H. Allison, and a payment of $100 was also indorsed thereon. Defendants John D. Allison and Jacob Bentler reside in Washtenaw county, while the defendant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Denison v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Herbage v. McEnteeMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Clark v. LichtenbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by2 opinions
- Grenawalt v. NyhuisMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Engel v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1918